Posted By HapHazard

I've decided that since this blog might be a good reference for any potential colleges and/or businesses, I might wanna delete the stuff about my life. Make it more professional, you know?

Anyone say no?

If I don't have at least three "No, keep the personal stuff here," by the next time I write an article, the personal "This is how my month went" thing is gone.

 
Posted By HapHazard

No, not the music type of rhythm. The circadian rhythm. Say what? Actually, we all know what it is. We just don't know what it's called. The circadian rhythm is the body's natural sleep cycle. In children, early bedtimes and early awakening times are fine. Elderly people can run on even less sleep. Adults circadian rhythm is right in the middle, which works well with some work schedules and poorly with others.

But in adolescence (which scientists have defined as between the ages of 11 and 22), this circadian rhythm is off. The adolescent body naturally falls asleep around 11 PM or so, and wakes up much later in the day. Teenagers need around 9 1/4 hours of sleep each night. So, if they naturally fall asleep around 11, they'd naturally wake up around 8:30 AM.

First, less examine this circadian rhythm, shall we? The circadian rhythm is a group of neurons deep within the brain. This rhythm produces and secrete melatonin, the sleep hormone. When the body has less melatonin, the brain is awake and functioning. When there is more melatonin, the body begins to feel drowsy, begins to shut down, and sleep ensues.

The teenage body doesn't release these hormones until much later at night: and it's very important to honor their natural sleep schedule. As many people know, they teenage body is a mass of uncontrollable hormones. During the day, they are quite emotional. However, night is when all the good hormones are used; growth hormones. Also, when a student has to wake up using an alarm clock, they miss a crucial sleep stage known as REM (That is, Rapid Eye Movement.) Many of us know this stage as when we dream. REM occurs at increasing intervals nearly all night, but the most important stage is the longest one--about nine hours in. During REM sleep, the brain basically presses the "reset" btton. Chemicals in emotional centers are returned to default, and short-term memory banks of the day are cleared. According to sleep physiologist Mary Carskadon (and others), people who suffer from lack of REM become cranky, depressed, with impaired judgement and memory. They also have decreased reaction time, and teens with less REM have been shown to  score lower grades.

Some attempts have been made by schools across the United Stqtes to fix the problem by starting school late. Some schools in Minnesota did such, and reported higher grades and better attendance. Most schools, however, are more than reluctant to push back school start times.  Margarita Dubocovich, a neuropharmacist at Northwestern University in Evanston, says that schools should also consider scheduling important tests (like the PSAT, which are often secheduled in the morning,) for later in the afternoon.

So what can we do at home?

Letting the teen sleep in  only throws off the biological clock further.

Less caffeine at night is encouraged.

Short, afternoon naps are advocated for.

Earlier bedtimes accomplish nothing except to have the teen laying awake for longer.

Close to bedtime, make the teen's room cool, dark, and quiet.

Do the same thing every night before bed: this helps your body recgnize patterns.

Encourage school officials to consider a later start time.  

Overall, the situation may seem bleak. Estimates put the sleep deprivation as affecting 80-85% of teenagers. Others say that nearly 30% of teens suffer from deprivation-related sleep disorders (Sleep-Deprivation.com). With some changes to lifestyle, and some cooperation from schools and parents, teens can win the sleep-battle.


 
Posted By HapHazard

Sorry I haven't posted in along time. I've got lots of ideas on mind for what to discuss next, but not a ton of time to do it. Most of these ideas are inspired by my Psych class. Lemme know which ones you wanna see:

-Effect of Media on Teen Pre-marriage Sex

-Effect of Media on Domestic Violence

- There was this one mom who drowned all her kids in a bath tub. A Psych analysis on her.

-Effect of Video Games on Violence

-The Roots of Discrimination

-Obediance and Conformity

 
Posted By HapHazard

I don't know if it's just my computer bumping me up because this is a familiar link, but I just googled "HapHazard's Blog" and I was the number one and two results!

I've also got somewhere over 10,000 hits now.

Thank you so much!

I love everyone that actively reads or comments on this blog =D

 

~HapHazard <3

 
Posted By HapHazard

Anyone who knows me well would know that up until recently, I had a very uncalled for but extreme fear of guns. I understand now just how wrong that fear was. After firing my first gun, I realized that a gun itself is not worth being afraid of. There is absolutely no reason to be afraid of looking at or touching a gun, whether loaded or unloaded. Now, I'm not afraid of guns. I'm afraid of what criminals do with guns.

But I do want one.  Why the change in heart? I want to have a gun while it's legal, that way if a criminal comes busting into my room I can defend myself.

Defend is the key word there. Just because I woulod have a gun does not make me a terrorist, as many left-wings would make you believe.

Many safe, law-abiding people have guns. Most of them never have to defend themselves with a gun. Most of them would never even think of pulling the trigger on someone. Yet the some members democratic party would like people to believe that those with guns are automatically crazy and bloodthirsty.

I personally would just like to say this is false. If you know me well, you know I apologize for everything. I accidently bump into a stranger in a crowded place: "Oh my goodness, I'm so sorry!" Now, take this into consideration when I ask this next question: Can you picture me actually wanting to shoot someone?

 

As I said earlier, a criminal is going to find a way to get a gun whether it's legal or not. It's part of what makes them a criminal. So really, what purpose do gun bans serve? If a criminal pulls a gun and starts shooting people, and no one has a gun to defend themselves, this criminal goes unhindered until the police show up... with guns, I might add. However, if one of the people at the shooting happens to have a concealed carry, they can quickly stop the criminal, saving the lives of potential victims.

Throughout Europe, most countries have gun bans. When there are shootings in Europe, there are usually many more casualties than when there are shootings here in America. Coincindence? No. Return to previous paragraph if you need assistance.

Think about this: College and high school campuses have some of the most famous shootings, correct? Now think about this: Most colleges and all highschools are aggainst carrying. In highschool, this is understandable as teenagers are, admittedly, reckless. But think about Columbine. If one of those teachers had a concealed carry, they easily could've disarmed the shooters before so many lives were taken and so many more wounded. Same case goes for the Virginia Tech shootings.

Are you getting the point?

Guns are not the bad guys here, and neither are the majority of people that carry guns! It's the criminals that carry them. And wouldn't you like knowing that you or someone around you might have a way of defense when a criminal pulls a gun on you? Gun bans are a trend right now. And soon, they'll be everywhere. But the criminals are still going to have guns.

Next time you hear about a public shooting in a gun-ban area (or any other area, for that fact), think: If someone in that area had a gun, couldn't the shooter have been stopped that much faster?

 

-HapHazard

 


 


 
Google

Recent Entries
 
Links
 
Visitors

You have 18102 hits.