Anyone who knows me well would know that up until recently, I had a very uncalled for but extreme fear of guns. I understand now just how wrong that fear was. After firing my first gun, I realized that a gun itself is not worth being afraid of. There is absolutely no reason to be afraid of looking at or touching a gun, whether loaded or unloaded. Now, I'm not afraid of guns. I'm afraid of what criminals do with guns.
But I do want one. Why the change in heart? I want to have a gun while it's legal, that way if a criminal comes busting into my room I can defend myself.
Defend is the key word there. Just because I woulod have a gun does not make me a terrorist, as many left-wings would make you believe.
Many safe, law-abiding people have guns. Most of them never have to defend themselves with a gun. Most of them would never even think of pulling the trigger on someone. Yet the some members democratic party would like people to believe that those with guns are automatically crazy and bloodthirsty.
I personally would just like to say this is false. If you know me well, you know I apologize for everything. I accidently bump into a stranger in a crowded place: "Oh my goodness, I'm so sorry!" Now, take this into consideration when I ask this next question: Can you picture me actually wanting to shoot someone?
As I said earlier, a criminal is going to find a way to get a gun whether it's legal or not. It's part of what makes them a criminal. So really, what purpose do gun bans serve? If a criminal pulls a gun and starts shooting people, and no one has a gun to defend themselves, this criminal goes unhindered until the police show up... with guns, I might add. However, if one of the people at the shooting happens to have a concealed carry, they can quickly stop the criminal, saving the lives of potential victims.
Throughout Europe, most countries have gun bans. When there are shootings in Europe, there are usually many more casualties than when there are shootings here in America. Coincindence? No. Return to previous paragraph if you need assistance.
Think about this: College and high school campuses have some of the most famous shootings, correct? Now think about this: Most colleges and all highschools are aggainst carrying. In highschool, this is understandable as teenagers are, admittedly, reckless. But think about Columbine. If one of those teachers had a concealed carry, they easily could've disarmed the shooters before so many lives were taken and so many more wounded. Same case goes for the Virginia Tech shootings.
Are you getting the point?
Guns are not the bad guys here, and neither are the majority of people that carry guns! It's the criminals that carry them. And wouldn't you like knowing that you or someone around you might have a way of defense when a criminal pulls a gun on you? Gun bans are a trend right now. And soon, they'll be everywhere. But the criminals are still going to have guns.
Next time you hear about a public shooting in a gun-ban area (or any other area, for that fact), think: If someone in that area had a gun, couldn't the shooter have been stopped that much faster?
-HapHazard